Help me with Steve Kaufmann's Wikipedia page!!

After hearing about Steve's run-in with a little Napolean over on Wikipedia, I thought I'd insert myself into all this fun, so I started a Wikipedia page on Steve himself. I've gone on there a few times before to check out Steve's bio, only to find myself surprised that no one had put anything up yet.

The same is actually true of LingQ as well. I do think that if Livemocha and Lang-8 get Wikipedia pages, then there's no reason why LingQ shouldn't have one. However, let's let that one cool off for a little bit and focus on Steve's entry for now.

Here's how I started it:

Steve Kaufmann is a Canadian polyglot linguist, author, award-winning blogger and the founder of the language-learning website LingQ. He currently speaks twelve languages to varying degrees of fluency: Cantonese, English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Mandarin, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish and Swedish.

I modeled the text after Michel Thomas' Wikipedia entry. I made lots of citations, but as the article's not so long, I marked it as a stub in the hope that you guys would step in and expand it.

To keep this from getting deleted, remember to cite! cite! cite! Steve's book is up on the web completely for free, and it's full of good, citable information (Wikipedia loves citations to books). And feel free to dig up any information that might be floating around the internets, especially on official sounding stuff (wasn't there an NPR interview a while back?).

Also, Steve, you're not allowed to edit your own entry, so please don't! But if you've got links to media coverage, that'd be helpful. And, of course, if "anonymous" comes along and edits the entry, hey, who's the wiser?

Daniel Tammet can really learn to speak a new language fluently, in a week, from scratch

When someone tells Daniel Tammet that he's got a gift for learning languages, there's no way he can deny it. Sure, he speaks eleven languages (or 12 if you count the language that he made up himself), but that's not what impresses me; check out this amazing feat:

Daniel was recently profiled in a British documentary called “Brainman.” The producers posed a challenge that he could not pass up: Learn a foreign language in a week - and not just any foreign language, but Icelandic, considered to be one of the most difficult languages to learn.

In Iceland, he studied and practiced with a tutor. When the moment of truth came and he appeared on TV live with a host, the host said, "I was amazed. He was responding to our questions. He did understand them very well and I thought that his grammar was very good. We are very proud of our language and that someone is able to speak it after only one week, that’s just great."

The actual video referred to is here (starting from 41:15).

Now if you give me a week of complete immersion and a good native-speaker tutor, I could make a great start in any language, but I don't think I could even come close to what Daniel was able to do. So what's the magic sauce and where can I get some? Well, it's unfortunately not quite as simple as all that; Daniel is a high-functioning autistic savant, so his brain works quite a bit differently from yours and mine.

If you've seen the movie Rain Man,that's a savant. Savant syndrome is a developmental disorder "characterized by one or more areas of expertise, ability or brilliance that are in contrast with the individual's overall limitations". In Daniel's case, his limitations are very few (for example, he's not a big fan of crowds and has trouble recalling faces), and his abilities are impressive—with his skills in language learning, memorization, and making complex calculations standing out as particularly impressive.

While I'm not putting any money down on anyone coming even close to Daniel's abilities (he's one of perhaps 50 in the entire world with skills like his), Daniel himself thinks that his learning strategy doesn't require his brain. Daniel's magic sauce, after the jump.

Read more... Here's what Daniel himself says:

The things that I can do are the result of a highly rich and complex associative form of thinking and imagination, an extreme variation of a kind that everyone does. Every time you make a pun or daydream or use a metaphor, you're actually thinking in much the same way as a savant.

He elaborates here:

My brain seems to be what I would describe as hyperassociative. It makes connections between information very rapidly and connections and relationships between very different things.

This is a well-known technique for learning, and this isn't the first time it's been suggested for language learning.

Indeed, I've recently been noticing the potency of associative techniques myself. As part of my own recent studies, I dumped into iAnki a boatload of Japanese Language Proficiency Test flashcards. That means that the vast majority of my flashcards are not taken from context, but rather are just a set of facts (the word, how that's pronounced if it has any kanji, and the meaning) that I need to connect to each other. This results in some of these words coming up again and again because they're just not getting in my head.

To remedy this, I've taken to making associative connections between the word and the data I'm looking to produce. I have no specific system for this, but whatever comes obviously to mind, I use. For instance, 健やか sukoyaka means healthy—that much was obvious to me from the character—but I couldn't get the reading of the character component of that word—suko—to stick in my head. I finally managed to do so by associating it with 少し sukoshi (a little). Originally, I had a little creole mnemonic—something like sukoshi de healthy ("with just a little bit, healthy"), but that eventually faded away and now I see the 健やか sukoyaka and 少し sukoshi automatically pops into my head. Sooner or later, that association too will fade away, and I'll just be left with the automatic recollection, thanks to associative techniques getting it in my head originally.

This is a lot less than the complex visual and numerical associations Daniel uses, but clearly we can all make use of this technique, even if we won't be able to jack it up to hyperdrive like Daniel can.

The only language-learning tool I can think of that is heavy on such associative devices are the Michel Thomas recordings, which are constantly linking up words in the target language with those that are similar in your own language, using mnemonic devices, and so on. (The Chinese one even tries to get you to link up each tone with a color, taking a page (unintentionally) straight from Daniel's playbook.)

Daniel himself has written two books, Born On A Blue Day: Inside the Extraordinary Mind of an Autistic Savantand Embracing the Wide Sky: A Tour Across the Horizons of the Mind.Both shed more light on his method and how he thinks it can apply to those of us with less impressive mental abilities, so I've added these both to my to-read list and I'd love to hear from any of you who've already read them in the comments below or via email.

Links:
Austisme Asperger, un Handicap Invisible [Paris Match] (in French)
The Boy with the Incredible Brain [Google Video]
Brain Man: One Man's Gift May Be The Key To Better Understanding The Brain [60 Minutes]
Brainman, at Rest in His Oasis [New York Times]
Daniel Tammet [Times]
Daniel Tammet [Wikipedia]
Embracing the Wide Sky (video) [Amazon]
His beautiful mind [Advocate]
The smartest man in the world is gay [Advocate via MyWire]
Optimnem Blog: The Blog of Daniel Tammet
A savvy savant finds his voice [The Australian]

Rosetta Stone takes on LiveMocha + Sponsored "Review" on TechCrunch

In a bid to stave off competitors like Livemocha (reviewed here) and Busuu, TechCrunch is "reporting" (I use the term loosely) that Rosetta Stone has finally taken their first major step into using social networking for language learning:

Their new system, called TOTALe, adds two interactive ingredients to the mix. The first is the Rosetta Studio, a live lesson area where you and two other students at your skill level work one-on-one with a live, native speaker.

Sounds like they're taking a cue from the Michel Thomas method here.

The second ingredient is Rosetta World, a matching service that connects a native speaker of one language with a learner of the other and, in some cases, vice versa.

And let's not forget the juicy price.

TOTALe will be available on [July 28, 2009,] and will cost $999 for a twelve month subscription. This includes Studio sessions and you can repeat sessions as necessary. After the introductory period it will cost $1,200.

And that's no typo.

So that's the crux of the news story. Unlike Time, however, John Biggs at TechCrunch found himself utterly unable to not gush over Rosetta Stone. However, you might be able to forgive him since Rosetta Stone sponsored the post.

The cringe-inducing gushing, after the jump.

Read more... After a truly fawning "review" (the only thing mentioned as a downside was the price tag, and, really, how could you even think of maintaining any modicum of objectivity and not hold that out as a minus?), this is where I really got my cringe on:

Rosetta Stone has been an effective teaching tool for over two decades.

So who exactly is calling this effective? Let me guess: Rosetta Stone. Moreover, even if we assume that's true, as they like to say in investment literature, past performance is no guarantee of future results.

The quality of the lessons is extremely high and the chance to work with a native speaker is unrivaled except in face-to-face schools.

Oh jeez... It sure sounds like someone was writing copy from a press kit. Extremely high compared to what? Rosetta Stone is only "unrivaled" in "the chance to work with a native speaker" if you forget about going to where the language is actually spoken! And even then I'm pretty sure it's rivaled by Livemocha and the other websites John himself sites (more on that below), but doesn't appear to have researched very well. (And we'll assume that by "face-to-face schools" John means language schools, because we sure know there aren't that many native speakers in the average school.)

This social, human aspect really brings the lessons home and adds an amazing amount of value to the program.

"Amazing!" Just oozing with objectivity.

John continues:

This idea isn't new.

Well at least he admits that.

Sites like Livemocha, Babalah, Palabea, Busuu, and Learn10 are all trying to create similar solutions. However, Rosetta Stone has a bit more budget and experience behind their TOTALe system.

Budget, probably, but experience? I'm not sure you've got the right experience when your primary product has long been mail-order software on CDs, highly advertised on late-night TV.

Finally, if you managed to read through to the very last paragraph, you learn that TechCrunch isn't exactly a neutral third party in this:

Incidentally, if you made it this far into the post you’re eligible to win one of ten year-long subscriptions courtesy of Rosetta Stone. Comment below using your real email address in the correct field and I’ll pick ten comments at random on Wednesday.

Luckily, I think one of the commenters on TechCrunch nails it on the head:

i’ve used rosetta stone before (the old program without the new social features) and i’ve used livemocha. livemocha was almost the same exact program as rosetta stone except with social features. So i don’t know what kind of an idiot would pay $999 for something they could get for free. rosetta stone might be a *little* bit better, but $999 worth?

And that, my friends, is the rub.

P.S. Here's an actual Rosetta Stone press release, just for comparison's sake.